Please Support us @ www.TomRenz.com and tomrenz.substack.com.
On Wednesday of last week I testified in the Ohio Senate in favor a piece of legislation that will be critical to stopping the WHO treaty and Disease X - Ohio HB73 (you can see my full testimony here:
Let me begin by explaining why this legislation is so critical. During COVID our corrupt federal government incentivized hospitals killing COVID patients. Yes, I said it and - as an attorney - I mean it. When a person went to a hospital during the height of COVID the hospitals received extra money for diagnosing the person with COVID (this is why there were literally zero flu diagnoses for a substantial period of time in the entire country). Once a person was diagnosed with COVID the hospital then received additional money from treating with Remdesivir, more again when the patient was put on assisted breathing, more yet when they were ventilated, and a final big old bonus when the patient died. Instead of offering hospitals more money for patients recovering the “experts” from Washington paid more for dead patients. Then to top this whole murder for hire scheme off, the cesspool that is DC extended legal immunity to these same hospitals from any malpractice, wrongful death, etc. that occurred from “COVID treatments.”
As a result, hospitals blocked patients from access to treatments like Ivermectin and HCQ. While some may attempt to argue that these treatments were unproven it is absolutely inarguable that withholding treatments like Budesonide (at proper dosages and for proper durations) were absolutely useful for pneumonia regardless of the cause of the pneumonia. Further, even if it was unclear whether or not HCQ or Ivermectin were useful (they were), why is it the government or hospital’s business to interfere with a patient receiving a properly prescribed medication that no one could argue would be dangerous in any way? Why wouldn’t pharmacists fill prescriptions for a Nobel prize winning drug that was known to be safe around the world for decades? There were zero valid reasons - it was simply corruption based on the fact that people getting well meant less bonus money from Fauci’s corrupt scheme.
HB73 would stop this and require prescriptions be filled and the patient be able to receive the drugs. This would allow doctors to, with informed consent, innovate if/when the next plandemic hits. The WHO and everyone else has already stated that Disease X is on the way (probably from the gain-of-function work being carried out on American soil now in our many university tied labs still being funded by our corrupt Biden controlled HHS). The innovation would demonstrate effective treatments in Ohio and that would spread all over. This bill actually has the potential to expose another cover up of a similar murder for hire scheme when the next plandemic hits because people would see Ohioans getting better while patients in a WHO or Federally sponsored death scheme keep dying.
So this bill passed the Ohio GOP controlled House with massive bipartisan and grassroots support. Yet in the Senate it appears to have been held up for a long time in committee and now the Republican in charge of that committee has been accused of lying about that bill despite literally hearing testimony from me and others a few days ago demonstrating what he is saying is clearly wrong. Look at this post from OAMF - an Ohio medical freedom group I work with extensively:
Find this tweet at https://x.com/ohioamf/status/1794091547660570927?s=61&t=chcz9dPKlqWymEZk8PFPug.
It appears that the lobbyists for big pharma, the hospitals, and pharmacies are looking for a reason to oppose this bill so they can keep the murder for money gravy train moving. It also appears that certain elected officials and lobby groups are more interested in big money than what Ohioans want or need to stay safe. In a completely dishonest attempt to provide cover for Republicans that are willing to sell out to big money, despite massive GOP grassroots support, these folks are attempting to claim this bill will somehow expand abortion. It won’t in any way. If, in fact, Huffman is working with crooked lobbyists to push this narrative then he - and they - are simply lying about the bill.
My stance on abortion is very clear and well-known; I am 100% right to life. I will never support a pro-abortion bill in any way but I support this bill completely. With that said, let me explain to you why this bill will do NOTHING to expand abortion.
In 2023 Ohio sadly passed Issue 1. Issue 1 is was a Constitutional Amendment that became Article 1 Section 22 of the Ohio Constitution. The entirety of that Amendment is here:
As you can see this Amendment plainly states in Section B that “The State shall not, directly or indirectly, burden, penalize, prohibit, interfere with, or discriminate against either: 1. An individual’s voluntary exercise of this right or 2. A person or entity that assists an individual in exercising this right…” regarding abortion (continuing one’s own pregnancy). This means that no law in Ohio can be passed that will, in ANY way limit access to abortion or abortion meds without Amending the Constitution further (I would be happy to volunteer my time to assist in that amendment process but it is irrelevant to this bill).
People in Ohio - by the Constitution have the broadest possible access to abortion drugs already and this bill is a statute - NOT a Constitutional Amendment - so it can neither expand or limit the rights laid out in the Constitution. Huffman and the lobbyists know this and I testified to it directly (you can see my full testimony here:
This law is one of the most carefully crafted state bills I’ve seen in the country. It provides proper liability protection for doctors, hospitals, and pharmacists while also allowing the right people to be held accountable if they are wreckless in providing treatment. At the same time the bill will allow doctors and patients, with informed consent, to decide what is best for their specific situation instead of corrupt bureaucrats. The real question our politicians need to ask themselves is whether they want the WHO and people like Fauci to decide what’s best for people or their doctors - a question that is especially meaningful for people without the economic means to fight back. Equally importantly to ask is whether a handful of complete RINOs will be able to undermine the credibility of a strong Ohio Republican Party. I guess we will see.
